1.) I’m not sure if I yet have enough trades of each combination to yield any statistically significant results were I to break the trades down in that manner.
2.) At this point, I have not finished processing and incorporating the changes into my trading from this most recent analysis

I have found that I perform best when I limit the number of changes I try to make to my trading at a time. For even when I try to focus on just one change, my results tend to deteriorate to some point as I incorporate the changes into my system.

In short, doing such in-depth stat-analysis is on my list of things to do, but I’m just not there yet.

once again a great article.
For me it underlines the importance of objective analyzing your trades. I use a similar tool with Microsoft access. This has the advantage, that I can match each trade, with the corresponding chart-screenshot. Furthermore I also analyze with this tool my whole day, for example I give points for achieving my student goals, or if I did sports, if i learned new trading stuff etc. . then the tool automaticaly generates bar charts, where it can give me a visual aim of how much i developed to a real serious Trader. If u are interessted, of course i can send u the tool.
Concerning your articel, i asked myself, if u have a statistic where u can see, which combination of tools are the most profitable? Of course I understand that the 3 factor plays are the most profitable, but i asked myself, if there are differences in profitability depending which 3 factors u use.
Despite my terrible English, I hope you understand what I want to express.
Again, thanks for the articel,

Florian